Quantcast
pixel

Know Your Whites

2007.01.11
My old Samsung 3MP









In 1679 Isaac Newton was sitting under an apple tree in Cambridge when a beautiful young undergraduate fell on him. This led him to discover the law of depravity.

A little later, while recovering from the resulting couch injury, he was contemplating into a glass of gin with light streaming-in from the window, split by a prism into a rainbow on his Principia. It was then that he realised that light is composed of the colours of the rainbow, now remembered by school kids with the mnemonic ROYGBIV.

But how much of each colour do you need to make white light? Is it this much red, or this much? Is white light purely (pun detector…ping!) arbitrary: who’s to say what mix of each colour you need to get white?

An apparently simple question reveals a rich topic, and by now you may be thinking why should I care, and what’s this got to do with photography, you rambling nong.

You might care because you’re into photography, which is all about light (surprising, eh). And your camera cares deeply because it’s racking its little electronic brain for you, trying to adjust itself to the “natural” white you’re in.

Under fluorescent light, a white piece of paper will look different than in sunlight, and different again under tungsten bulbs. Somehow the AWB (Auto White Balance) feature sticks a metaphorical wet finger into the air and works it out. (anybody have a simple explanation?)

My camera (Canon 350D) seems to get it right most of the time, it’s only about as smart as a I am before my morning coffee, so it can get it wrong.

That’s why the nice camera people allow us to override the auto setting. Mine has Auto, plus 6 others, and one custom. Have a decko at the images, which show one of each (silly me forgot to write them down, so I can't tell you which is which).

Okay, so what’s white? Apparently there’s a fancy theory that all bodies emit light according to their temperature. At 1,000 degrees, it different to 2,000 degrees – the mix of colours varies as you go.
And just to make it really confusing, they call it “black body radiation”. Well I think that’s way off, so I’m renaming it “white body radiation”.

If you want to know more, have a gander at the Wiki.

PS – in spite of all this, I rarely touch the white balance on my camera
4 Comments
Artemis I worked in a photo processing lab in the early 80's long before any digital brain to work things out and I had to do the "colour analysis" for those extra large prints of people's weddings that used to be so popular. You try to work out the "white" thats "right" on a wedding dress and that will get your brain very tired.
BTW I think pic number one is the right white.
PS did you know that they commisioned a "special shade of white" for our Parliament House.....! and people wonder where all the money went!
Artemis · 2007-01-11: 04:52
chipotle so which one is navajo white? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navajo_white .)

somehow, i bet that doesn't travel well across an ocean.

it's amazing what a difference the slightest tint makes. and that white can be either warm or cool.

i enjoy your photos very much. i think i enjoy the musings that accompany them as much of not more.

very well done.
chipotle · 2007-01-11: 11:16
bunyip Cheer up Cherax - It'll be all white on the night!

BTW, in 1978 scientists discovered that black holes emit a black body radiation of 3K - which is probably about the same temperature of Parliament House during question time!
bunyip · 2007-01-11: 15:00
jpfromoz Very good musing... Perhaps the REAL question is not "what's white?" but "what's quality?". Ever tried to define that in a photograph (or anything else for that matter!

Great clouds BTW.
jpfromoz · 2007-01-11: 15:49
Bold Text
Italic Text
UnderLine Text
URL Link

Name
URL
Enter the code to the right below
Captcha

Views: 552
Tagged: white balance newton
 
pixel
« 2007.01.10
 
pixel
2007.01.12 »
pixel