|
«
|
»
|
|
|
Lovely!
BogdanTelea · 2010-04-09: 16:11
|
|
|
Very nice. I like 2 and 2 alone. Some extent to 6 also With all due respect, not that i am against HDR (u may know well), and although the sky looks equally good, the lack of any well defined subject in the foreground wasted all the effort u put in the post processing. A closer up, taken from toward the right, in a perspective with the tree looking bigger and in vertical orientation would have made for a better HDR as the tree would end up being our foreground subject! Hope i dont overstep my line. :) regards.
soubhagya · 2010-04-09: 16:17
|
|
|
very interesting effects
krasotulichka · 2010-04-09: 16:18
|
|
|
Excellent. Thanks for sharing.
smbunation · 2010-04-09: 17:26
|
|
Ok... I go and study and then I come back. To my analphabet eye is an excellent chronic and study... I like no. 2 ;-)
????? · 2010-04-09: 18:33
|
|
cool!
????? · 2010-04-09: 22:25
|
|
|
All pics are amazing! I like a lot this HDR technique ;) as much as I like the Fish eye !!!! Congratulations for this post! It's impressive!
DAMihaela · 2010-04-10: 01:43
|
|
|
Wow. So useful explanation for me to understand HDR. Thanks, Gerd.
huiching · 2010-04-10: 03:57
|
|
|
amazing pictures!
Eiram · 2010-04-10: 12:46
|
|
|
Very cool.
boszorka65 · 2010-04-10: 15:20
|
|
|
thanks for sharing! well done my friend!
asylum666 · 2010-04-10: 20:20
|
|
|
Super, thanks for showing it step by step!
eternity65 · 2010-04-11: 12:08
|
|
|
Ich verstehe nichts von HDR, aber das resultat sieht toll aus.
Unchained · 2010-04-11: 13:25
|
|
|
Nice! This Jaipur.
karans · 2010-04-12: 12:51
|
|
|
Beautiful and interesting!
wildduck · 2010-04-12: 13:03
|
|
|
Nimmst du Photomatix? Mir sind die Schatten einfach zu weit hochgezogen und zu gesättigt.
Wasichseh · 2010-04-12: 16:09
|
|
|
HDR is the best ;)
onlyricky · 2010-04-13: 13:55
|
|
«
|
»
|