| ScubaLiz · 2008-09-17: 20:57 | |
|
Reply ⇔ My Birthday
I was going to surprise you that I remembered your birthday and posted a fishy photo in your honor and then I looked at your photoblog and you already said it is your birthday. Oh well.
Hey, you did surprise me, just visited your blog! Very nice, I am impressed you remember! Thanks, that was really nice!
|
| gderuiter · 2008-09-11: 07:07 | |
|
Reply ⇔ Late Summer Garden
#15 is Lamium, I think.
Oh, thank you!
|
| gderuiter · 2008-09-11: 07:06 | |
|
|
Reply ⇔ Squirrels Crack Me Up
How did you get #1? It's awesome!
I saw the confrontation coming and just snapped "at it"! Total luck to get him in such a funny leap like that!
|
| ScubaLiz · 2008-09-07: 23:19 | |
|
|
I definitely am fond of cats in ALL sizes! SIX cats - did you add one or is my memory worse than I realize? ;) I am totally jealous of your raccoons! So cool! |
| ScubaLiz · 2008-09-07: 20:47 | |
|
|
Reply ⇔ Cheetah!
What beautiful cheetah photos! You'd wonder how all those spots could be camaflouge, then you see (or don't see) one lying in the grass and you know.
Thanks! Guess you couldn't tell I'm kind of fond of the big cats!
|
| FriksVaporup · 2008-09-07: 16:18 | |
|
Reply ⇔ Red attraction
What macro lens do you use? How do you photograph a bee without it beeing blurry from the buzzing? These are beautiful!
I have a compact camera (Canon PowerShot A720IS) and usually bees are calm in the flowers. That's all!Thank you! ;-) |
| ScubaLiz · 2008-08-01: 18:22 | |
|
|
Reply ⇔ Reading Tutor Needed.....
You do the best explanations and then educate us as well. It's always fun to see what you come up with.
Hey, thanks! I can't help it, I'm terminally curious and I absorb useless information like a sponge. Must be genetic, yeah, that's it, it's my parents' fault! ;)
|
| hazaj · 2008-07-20: 04:03 | |
|
Reply ⇔ Dance or ....
What a perfect selection for a great theme! I love these!
thanks so much!
|
| ScubaLiz · 2008-07-19: 16:11 | |
|
|
An online photo course sounds like fun. Must mean you are up as I type this. Another bonehead here; I thought you'd use a faster ISO if there was motion and the photo would have been blurry with the amount of light present. Maybe that's why there's no noticeable difference in a stilllife??
It is fun, and I am learning a lot. Well, that's just another way of saying raise the ISO to get the shutter speed needed for a given aperature, but that applies equally to moving or non-moving targets. Clearly, there's more than one combination of values of the three to get a particular exposure, and given how well newer DSLR's control noise, I think I'd rather up the ISO than use a tripod any day! ;)
|
| ????? · 2008-07-12: 13:26 | |
|
I admire your post on Feb. 13. What pleasure to watch slideshows of your work and that of Gretel and Liz while sipping a cuppa in the morning. |
