Quantcast
pixel

Agra - Taj Mahal

2007.05.08
How original?

I have a small theory about photographing iconic buildings like the Taj Mahal. As buildings are built for people to use and enjoy i think its honest to put people back in the frame. The return of the human element should bring something new to this genre of photograph. Typically and traditionally its all about getting tourists out of the way, whether its for your own holiday snaps or if you are a professional photographer, tourists not being considered particularly picturesque. Surely, there is no other building that represents this tradition of photography better than the Taj Mahal. The people in my photograph are tourists but they are Indian and that's interesting.

I want to see things represented in more contemporary ways. I am a little bored with seeing well-known subjects as if they exist in pristine isolation, smug in their perfection. The real thing is not like that. There may be a few tiles missing from the Taj; a bit of mould growing on a patch of wall somewhere. From an aesthetic point of view, these things are interesting. People are messy too and that makes for surprising and interesting pictures.

Modernism was all about perfection. Postmodernism is about imperfection. We live in a postmodern world now.
2 Comments
jammm I have no problems with working this one out, but you`re right :) My title is gone now.
jammm · 2007-05-08: 18:25
ShangriLa The Taj is much more striking after having seen a lot of the other historical architecture in India. On my first trip I only saw the Taj was the only grand architecture I saw and I was a bit underwhelmed - mainly due to the symmetry I suppose. I was never in any doubt of its beauty but I just didn't feel anything in the one hour I had there.
ShangriLa · 2008-04-01: 20:07
Bold Text
Italic Text
UnderLine Text
URL Link

Name
URL
Enter the code to the right below
Captcha

Views: 596
 
pixel
« 2007.05.06
 
pixel
2007.05.09 »
pixel