pixel
onlyricky
This is a subject full of taboos, and even nowadays people don't see nude artistic as an artistic thing.
I'd like to know what you guys think about it.
Also If you know somethings about it, could you teach it? Like how should we do with the light, should it be darker?
Should Nude photos be in BW or in color?
If there is anyone who does it, please share some tips. Thanks.
pixel
GKorts
Well Ricky, have a look at that link. There is no rule, like in every other kind of photography. All is possible tabu is only in the brain of the observer.
Nude directory
pixel
revenant
Human portraits are probably the hardest to achieve. Probably the hardest type of human portrait is the nude. Allow space for the imagination and apply the principle that less is more.

A nude is a study of texture, not taboo. In texture, the first and foremost rule is that of learning how to shape light with and on your subject. The intimacy created between the subject and the viewer should not be based on repression but on discovery. Perhaps nudes should be left to old people. Mapplethorpe's later nudes are far more appealling and attractive than his earlier ones and I, for one, have never liked Newton.

Don't think naked: think lighting and elbows; lighting and knees; lighting and necks. In nudes, photography is closer to fine arts, so take a look at Ingres for the classicism, at Manet for the humour, at Matisse for the wildness and at Rembrandt, always at Rembrandt, as the master of lighting and technique. Oh, and Reubens if your model is a bit chubby ;-)

The important thing to remember is that nudes don't have to attract - they do that by being nude, as we're all intrigued. Good nudes are those that provide interest and thought.
pixel
revenant
I forgot to mention: don't post them here. The religious decency / thought police here will tell you what a degenerate you are before you're slapped with the PB equivalent of an ASBO: restricted to friends only. Post them on RedBubble (try a group called 'bodyscapes' or search there for nude groups).

I think the litmus test here is the slightest hint of pubic hair and you're friends-only. In this, the standard is reminiscent of pre-war 'morals' statutes in the US, where photographers had to scrutinize their prints for said hair or risk prosecution if they mailed their prints to customers. Oh, and I forgot: nothing that dangles either.

The censorship here makes sense for a broad-based site with a strong family focus. My only problem is when narrow-minded PB members with a strong religious bent start telling other members what they can and cannot post. Avoid the issue by posting in a serious site (and put a link here).
pixel
revenant
@ Vincent63 : vas-y. Essaie. Je t’aurai au moins prévenu. On a consigné 2 de mes amies à leurs quartiers (et moi avec – si tu avais fait l’effort, certes important, de lire le blog que tu avais traité de « nul », tu aurais compris) parce qu’elles ont montré une fesse / un sein / quelques poils en trop. Ce n’est pas de la prophétie, mais un souvenir très clair. Dans une communauté dont l’adhésion est volontaire, nous sommes obligés de conformer aux normes de pudeur et d’intolérance religieuse qui animent ce site très américain à l’origine et qui sert principalement de vitrine pour les photos de famille. C’est une leçon que j’ai durement apprise, même si je m’y oppose. Heureusement, il y a d’autres sites où la qualité et le sérieux photographiques sont de taille. J’en ai cité un plus haut.

Par contre, je suis tout à fait d’accord avec toi sur Weston. Le célèbre nu de 1936 en est un exemple parfait, et le sujet (sa femme) raconte précisément la même histoire du maître qui contrôlait soigneusement la présence de poils…


pixel
onlyricky
wow!
I'm happy for these replies!

@Gkorts: Thanks for the site ! I'll have a look for sure!

@Revenant: As for the hardest to archive I needed some tips and help! I won't be using my phone, but a DSRL when I am doing this, so the quality and other stuff won't be the problem. As for the hardest I agree, I must focus on the perfection and the sharpness of the body and not on other things.
I think I'm not ready to modeling nude, but I've with who can do it. So I'm pondering doing it soon. As for it, I'd like to ask if the background of the picture matters on this kind of picture? I mean, should the background be simple and modest?
I think posting them here is like put fire on a forest, and I really appreciate the courage people get.
But you're right, some people see a chest hair coming out from the shirt, it is porn already. lol
I've already created a redbubble account. probably I'll be posting them over there, when I make them. and share the link over here for the interested.

@eternity65:
I'm also thinking in doing it in BW, it can hide some ''imperfections'' that we might see on the body while in color we can see it. Also in BW, we focus only on the artistic side and not in the sexual side.
I'll be checking about this when the time comes, as for now, I just want to get the most information I can hehe!;)
ah! there are courses like that but they are far from the little village in the middle of no where that i'm in (lol just kidding, i don't live in the middle of nowhere), so all I can do is do it in my own!;)

@vincent63: Sorry for not reply you in french! I'm better on understanding than writing, but your links about nude are totally good!
I like the last one especially


thank you all
pixel
revenant
With respect to my American friends and their sensibilities, I wasn't claiming that being American automatically means you're a prude. What I was saying is that double standards apply to nudity in the US more, perhaps, than in the European countries I know. Unlike Sweden or Germany, movies are rated in the US primarily according to sexual content, not violence, but the US boasts the world's biggest porn industry. On a more concrete level, I have seen some doubtful images go unnoticed here, but all it takes is for one outraged, religious bigot to complain about the odd nipple or bum and friends of mine get restricted to friends only. I left the community because I was restricted to friends only for showing a pre-impressionist oil painting (OK, of a vagina) in protest at all the adverts PB showed of dating agencies which said (in Greek, since that's where I was) "meet hot chicks tonight!". In PB's defence, I know the administrators had no control over the ad content in the days before pro accounts.

Provocation may be Vincent63's forte and complaining mine, but instead, I'll make a request for something that I'm pretty sure we'll never see here: clear guidelines about what is or is not acceptable.

We'll never see it because the administrators scrupulously avoid anything as divisive as such a measure in this community (and I think they're right to do so); because it will merely serve as an arena for libertarian degenerates like me to bitch at people with strong religious values and finally because such a measure would have to be enforced, which is all but impossible.

Oof! If you've read this far and are American with strong religious values that get outraged at wobbly bits of flesh, you'll know that I think you are merely the exception that proves the rule - and that I probably like you nonetheless...
pixel
Reply
pixel
pixel