zed, you dead head! you nailed it in your charming way again! bless ya for that!

"sunset & petal burnout" - love that expression...
@ catdruid and shuttercritter, you're sweet, too. however. i have to admit, i'm not as democratic as you guys/girls are, and if i COULD, i actually WOULD put up a law that forbids taking pictures of any cheap and always available topic like babies, flowers, pets and beautiful women. yes, i would... i'm a jerk tyrant deep, deep in my heart, but thanks to social bindings and good friends never was able to live out that dark side of mine...
and furthermore - following richard feynmann, i don't really give a damn if my provocations upset anybody or if you look through them... i USE them as a technique to introduce an idea. there's worse techniques and probably better ones, but this one works for me.
i'm present in the internet since it became popular around 1850, and i know about flame wars, rants and what their power is. turns out you NEED a little provocation to get some brains going in the virtual domains... well, i got YOURS going, and i even got zed interested enough to post here... so what does a simple mind like me want more?
now, back to the argument.
i'm still waiting for someone to argue with me about what i find most dangerous about all this themes stuff - which is, to my personal opinion, the following:
by posting a picture to a theme, you "blow up" the meaning of this picture - it suddenly becomes part of a wider scheme... which is, of course, total bullshit (because we're way to fragmented in our view of the world and those so called bigger schemes was always turned out to be religious nonsense... oh geez, i guess that was offending to somebody... damn, can't get my finger on the "delete" button!). that happened in the "free tibet" case, and to some extend in the "flowers for peng che"case. to prove my thesis, just omit the "free tibet" title and reference from most of of the blogs and you'll get perfectly ordinary pictures with NO MEANING AT ALL... or at least nothing that would hint into the tibet or freedom direction. (don't get me wrong... pictures without meaning aren't bad... they have lots of value to me, i post them all the time)
second, by posting into a theme, you rip off one quality of the picture... which is that it's interpretation and meaning is in the eyes of the beholder! so, by pressing it into a theme, you restrict people finding NEW and interesting meaning in it that you might have not seen yourself... which is, at least for me, a huge fun factor in looking at pictures of other people... or have them look at mine.
third, by posting into themes you act like a sheep in a herd. some front sheep bleaks, you bleak back. and although that's in general a quite amiable social behaviour, it becomes extremely suspicious to me when it's done by the hundreds or thousands. i like same mindedness... but only when i'm drunk and depressed.
sorry, too long entry again - but i can't help it... the topics is not finished for me yet. love to hear your thoughts about this.