1/3 to .6 of a second shots at f22 to f25 in daylight no ND filters in my kit yet.

Wow! I love the first 2 Mark. The water looks .... irresistible! liveandletlive · 2012-06-01: 23:13

I like these Mark.... this is a tough challenge without a filter, but you pulled it off very nicely McMommy · 2012-06-01: 23:14

Interesting shots...the long exposure makes the water look beautiful! threepeas · 2012-06-01: 23:17

Well done. joycephotography · 2012-06-01: 23:41

Well done, they are beautiful! darfoster · 2012-06-02: 00:13

Excellent! I have yet to shoot water like this but always wanted to ilikethat · 2012-06-02: 03:04

That is too cool. Going to have to move away from the auto setting and learn to do some things other than point and shoot. . . . . too cool. :) karmankwarner · 2012-06-02: 08:37

Good work Mark. I think that "long exposure" it's only a conventional denomination. "Long", normally refers to these ranges of time exposure that we can "take in hands". But, if you are an extremely quiet and solid man, probably might shot at 1/3seg without tripod...then whats the longer exposure time? I think that "long exposure" is a relative concept about the velocity, not from the camera exposition lapse, but to the quickly movement of the subject, not only this also in relation with it's environment. Thats why i think that 1/3seg it's an enough long exposure for this shot. ASINUS · 2012-06-02: 09:07

so beautiful! Shaparak · 2012-06-02: 21:42

looks great especially without a nd filter! beth0110 · 2012-06-03: 18:15

great effect! bravo! I like them very much. gonia · 2012-06-04: 08:16

beautiful shots! I need to learn how to do this for more powerful water shots! chelmck · 2012-06-04: 09:39

They're lovely - just long enough to create that soft water look :-) girafferacing · 2012-06-04: 15:19

Tagged: ptc37