|
Como diría Pablo Motos: "¿Culo o codo? XD XD XD
jrregaldie · 2009-07-23: 10:38
|
|
I have no idea what this is Ruth, but maybe I should flag it now before you reveal it to us... Hahah, only joking!! I know what you are saying and that blog now has 855 views...I had put the text of it into translate, but it didn't make much sense, so I gave the benefit of the doubt, in case it was actually intelligent or ironic in some way...I will trust you in your translation of it. Anyway yes, this will be an interesting experiment to see if you also get 800 views today...maybe I should draw a house and call it sexy house hahaha ;-)
tedbarlow · 2009-07-23: 11:04
|
|
lol...The fingers together.
Kozuka · 2009-07-23: 11:15
|
|
it is the arm when you close it gets like that! BTW , Ruth, I didnt see it on the top! do you have the link? If I had seen it for sure I'd comment, because i cant stand sexist maniacs, misogynist and expecially homophobic people! they are sick! Also Photoblog have ''cheaters'' that for some reason, I dont know how they put their pages in some software or in some site that makes their number of views increase! for example this one the other day posted at the same time as me, and he commented my post 1 minute after we post (because I've posted and he was before me) and I went to see his picture and he had already 300 views! tell me, Is that Famousy or cheat? its obvious that your ''homophobic'' guy did the same! please can you give me the link of it? or you couldnt save?
onlyricky · 2009-07-23: 11:31
|
|
Yes, you're right. Anyway, I have never used the flag function because usually I watch only the blogs of my friends and I added them to my friends list because I like them and their photos. I don't like to watch popular and FP posts, and the views calculator is deceiving, because it counts every opening of a page, so you can just open your own page 500 times and you get in the popular list..
Nellinka · 2009-07-23: 11:32
|
|
Ruth I've found : http://www.photoblog.com/davidminayo/2009/07/22/poder-libertad-sexual.html I told something :P
onlyricky · 2009-07-23: 11:48
|
|
Well done for this post Ruth. I have not seen the post myself, but the words 'sexual' with pictures of children in it have NO place being together on a public website - even if the content is innocent it WILL attract peodiphiles. (unfortunately sometimes peodiphiles use pictures of children they have found on public websites and super-impose them over the faces of pictures of children being abused - thus preventing the child from being identified (my mother has worked in child protection most of her life, so this is not a sick urban myth, it is sadly a reality)) The web is liberating for some but a brutal tool in the exploitation of others. Use your gut instinct, if a post feels wrong then flag it.....
Julias365 · 2009-07-23: 11:51
|
|
Yes, you're right.....;)
JaCkYe · 2009-07-23: 11:57
|
|
Well I would bet for half a mouth but to be honest that was before I read your text. Before I thought more about the opposite region :-)) To flag this pic was the right idea. I was on that pic and unluckywise as I dont speak Spanish I would not have commented perhaps even not thought about something.
GKorts · 2009-07-23: 13:41
|
|
OMG Ruth, you should be ashamed to put nude pictures of your husbands waxed toes here in public!!!! This is totally unacceptable!! ;-)))) i think it's ether your fingers or your mouth hmmmm not easy. Now about the main reason for your post, I do agree 100% with you about adding such titles to, or in association with pictures of children, even when they are dressed. This is indeed unacceptable!! But about nudity as a whole, pfiew, it's a hard subject to start a debate on, as there is such a thin line between artistic nudity and just plain nudity and then pornography, where do you draw the line? What you might find an artistic picture or sculpture or painting, others may think of it as porn or vice versa. As you know and have seen, i dare to set foot in the artistic nudity area, and admit that i want to do more of it as it is an art form that i've always admired. Nudity and art have always gone together hand in hand, Just look at all those paintings, sculptures and other art forms from years ago, Rembrandt, Breugel, Rubens, Goya, Jean-Leon-Gerome, Michel Angelo and many many others of which i can't think of their names right now, also the cultures, look at the ancient Greeks for example , the artists called it art, but the vatican (just to give the most extreme example) called it scandalous. Although anybody who takes art classes must learn about nude art also. Nudity must be artistic, nice to look at, and not vulgar. So to make this short, nudity for me is a yes, as long as it is artistic and clean. oeps, i was thinking of posting something special with a little nudity again soon, now i'm hoping you won't mind :-/
eternity65 · 2009-07-23: 13:47
|
|
Bravo Ruth! You are right! Everyone should put a flags on irresponsible images. Your photo is so artistic! Beautiful pic.
JumiElla · 2009-07-23: 15:54
|
|
I totally agree with you Ruth...this is not the place for those kinds of images!!! To me there is a huge distinction between art and images that offend. BRAVO!!!
lynnsgallery2 · 2009-07-23: 19:29
|
|
Clever image Ruth - are you about to punch someone? I've never thought of flagging anything, but to be honest like Nellinka I usually only look at friends posts.
Jarvo · 2009-07-23: 19:59
|
|
I agree 100 percent with your post this is suppose to be a nice safe website that I would not mind my daughter visiting it could change so easily, and where do we go then?
slowpete · 2009-07-24: 00:26
|
|
Here, here!
jet28 · 2009-07-24: 02:24
|
|
200 % apoiado... minha grande guerreira! ... e gostei do humor do teu post. :))
Unchained · 2009-07-24: 03:13
|
|
hehe, didn't think of bending my fingers, but i was close :-))
eternity65 · 2009-07-24: 04:37
|
|
I usually only look at friends posts, so I never flag, but I can understand your anger.
Ryana · 2009-07-24: 06:12
|
|
Ah! I thought immediately of two fingers united :-))
firehorsecri · 2009-07-24: 07:38
|
|
lol....I came up with almost
Kozuka · 2009-07-24: 08:31
|
|
Ha! Ha! used to do that as a child but with a hole in a piece of paper and a potty drawn under it with a child's body drawn on top.
????? · 2009-07-24: 12:42
|
|
Very well said Ruth! I've seen a couple of inappropriate postings recently but wasn't sure how to report them - now I know how.
girafferacing · 2009-07-25: 03:39
|
|
Pues yo hubiera dicho culo.... Totalmente de acuerdo con tu disertación, Ruth, creo que tienes toda la razón. Viendo el número de visitas de ese post, está claro que hay mucha gente que no entiende photoblog como lo que debiera ser.. En fin, que le vamos a hacer
Chete · 2009-07-27: 14:09
|
|
I'll :)
onlyricky · 2009-07-29: 05:35
|
|
|
|