|
«
|
»
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal expression! It all looks like Art to me! Great post Ricky!
ArtBee · 2010-01-17: 11:31
|
|
|
interesting .....great post
borogovoi · 2010-01-17: 11:46
|
|
This is a hard and complicate question... I agree with you in almost all... but I think there is a thin difference between what is art and what not. For me not everything is art. Art has to inspire us, it has to uplift our spirit, provoke any kind of feeling in us... or the absence of feelings. Moreover, there are some things we know with our minds and some others we know with our heart/soul. For me, Art is in the second group. ^_^
????? · 2010-01-17: 12:29
|
|
|
and to add something to Ruth words, not only to us self but a kind of common agreement. A piece of art which is only understood by a handful of people is no art but arrogance. To be clear common agreement is a percentage between a handful and some more but not less.
GKorts · 2010-01-17: 12:51
|
|
Interesting questions and opinions. Maybe I'll take the Ayn Rand approach and say "art is" Really nice, Ricky.
????? · 2010-01-17: 12:55
|
|
|
Very interesting. "Art does not exist. It declares itself" Harold Rosenberg
noptek · 2010-01-17: 12:55
|
|
|
great post Ricky... for me...I do not think about something if it IS art or not...for me it is important if I feel something looking at it (or hearing it...)...does the painting, music, statue, photo, talk to me? do I feel something, do I "hear" something?...well...THAT is important for me...
Eiram · 2010-01-17: 13:04
|
|
|
I agree with Eiram :-)
hannamagnusson · 2010-01-17: 13:46
|
|
|
Excellent post, Ricky. Very well thought out. Love the Dali interpretation by the way.
smbunation · 2010-01-17: 14:01
|
|
|
Art is different for everyone. For me, good art is something that awakens feelings in me, set me thinking... Very interesting post, Ricky!!
Ryana · 2010-01-17: 14:16
|
|
Art is the last bastion of free speech. Art holds no position, no allegiance, no standpoint and so it moves freely, between, around and through the institutes, but is not bound by any of them. Art holds no duty to science, politics or religion but often serves them freely and in so doing shows us humanity and humility where before there was dogma and suffering. Colin Renfrew says this; Over the past century or so the visual arts have transformed themselves from their preoccupation with beauty and the representation of the world into something much more radical. Today, I would claim, the visual arts have transformed themselves into what might be described as a vast, unco-ordinated yet somehow enormously effective research programme that looks critically at what we are and how we know what we are – at the foundations of knowledge and perception, and of the structures that modern societies have chosen to construct upon those foundations. Colin Renfrew – Figuring it out – Pg 7
????? · 2010-01-17: 14:43
|
|
|
Art is my heart.
gonia · 2010-01-17: 15:05
|
|
|
Art is something you don't understand... :-)
wfrnk · 2010-01-17: 15:10
|
|
|
I definitely like the portrait image.
maharba · 2010-01-17: 15:10
|
|
|
everybody wanna be an artist :)
nieprzyzwoita · 2010-01-17: 15:17
|
|
Just perfect post!
????? · 2010-01-17: 15:33
|
|
|
I agree with Eiram :-)
boszorka65 · 2010-01-17: 15:42
|
|
|
interesting. cool... original and imaginative
miltonjacob · 2010-01-17: 16:27
|
|
|
i'm not a artist...so....:)
DutchMountains · 2010-01-17: 16:27
|
|
|
Very thoughtful post Ricky. I think art as a topic has very fuzzy boudaries, what is art to one may not be to another (person or circumstance). Of all the descriptions here I think Sandra's one fits best for me. But that's just my opionion. What I know is, you are an astist Ricky, because I can see you above in your artist's hat and goggles.
Jarvo · 2010-01-17: 16:32
|
|
|
Very interesting Post! art is ever thing in life
finbarr · 2010-01-17: 16:34
|
|
|
beauty and art is only in the eye of the beholder....the artist however must be free to create without limitations....interesting essay....
kenzshots · 2010-01-17: 17:16
|
|
|
Great post Ricky, forme, ART is a capture of feelings, emotions, memories be it in a photograph, sketch, poem or sculpture......I can't do poetry or sculpture and I haven't been inspirde to get my art materials out to sketch in years so I try and capture my world, memories, emotions and experiences through photography.....it doesn't have to be technically brilliant, just an honest record of that moment....
jevsnw · 2010-01-17: 17:26
|
|
|
Interesting post! =)
wanazza · 2010-01-17: 19:10
|
|
|
Great post and very interesting words...excellent shots :))
lynnsgallery2 · 2010-01-17: 20:55
|
|
|
Ricky, you're thinking way too hard. Take a nap! lol
lgnelson · 2010-01-17: 21:12
|
|
|
...I do believe that this is unique !!!!!
curlyq60 · 2010-01-17: 21:25
|
|
|
Very interesting and thoughtful post. Not sure I have a definition for you.
thebronzebow · 2010-01-17: 21:33
|
|
|
Ricky, I have truly enjoyed this post! Your thoughtful words are intriguing....and all the comments afterwards are very interesting and thought-provoking. You're wise beyond your years, Ricky....thank you for this wonderful post!
lookagain · 2010-01-17: 21:38
|
|
I know that Ted's definition is basically what is accepted in the art world today, but that is not necessarily all art to me. When I can go to MOMA and see a clothesline strung with underwear (yes, I saw that!) it is not art to me! The same for total pornography (which I also saw in MOMA.) When a famous artist can walk on a plank over a huge canvas, randomly throwing paint, cut it up, sign each one, and sell each one for thousands of dollars, that is not art to me. A bunch of lines, applied between masking tape, may be visually appealing, but TO ME that is also not real art, but more like a craft on canvas. Art needs a certain real talent, creativity and training, and it should portray something, even in its abstract form. It also should be appealing or speak to us in some way. And I think that maybe even really good photography can be an art form, or at least good photography is artistically appealing. Nice post for getting everyone thinking, Ricky!
????? · 2010-01-17: 23:49
|
|
|
This is an interesting post,
pickledherring · 2010-01-18: 00:18
|
|
|
i like the idea #2.
arkijay · 2010-01-18: 03:49
|
|
Leah, I don't disagree with anything you say but I was not refering to any individual artwork or artist. My statement holds true just as much for displeasing and meaningless art as any other kind. If I were to do something quite outrageous, society would certainly frown upon me, but as soon as I declare myself 'artist' the attitude changes and becomes more tolerant. This is because society understands that there has to be a place for expression and warms itself to people who strive to keep expression and dialogue open. As soon as any society curbs the right to make even the most banal art then that society finds itself with problems. None of this exhonorates the artist from taking responsibility for their actions and maybe a 'bad' artwork is one that lacks integrity. There are many that would say art should be this or art should be that...but art doesn't allow itself the luxury of basking in any one particular garden. I don't know what you mean by the 'art world' but the critics, curators, dealers, or anyone else that attempts to manipulate art aren't challenged by society but by the artists themselves...this is another unseen responsibilty that artists have to consider. Maybe some or even all of the artists and artworks you cite lack integrity, or maybe you you didn't understand some meaning...either way we need to take a closer look at the society that puts you, me and them into these situations. If MOMA chose a work of yours or mine to be exhibited we could simply decline the invitation or accept that the work must have a quality that society reads as meaningful. I've got a pretty good hunch that either of us would take the latter path. I am applying to make a show for MOMA Cymru (Wales) and if I am accepted I will have 2 years to prepare for that show. So a lot of considered thought would go into making a a meaningful and pleasing show...but whatever I exhibit will come under criticism from somebody, this is unavoidable in art today, and reflects a healthy attitude and society that can't claim art to be one thing or another. If I exhibit 'traditional' paintings then many will say that I'm living in the past and have no insight into how the world around me really is. If I exhibit something very conceptual then many will say my work lacks substance :-)) The atrist can never please everybody and will always take body blows by 'putting themselves on the line' and that is how I would read meaning into the work you describe...somebody has to generate dialogue and keep that dialogue open.
????? · 2010-01-18: 04:47
|
|
|
Such a thought-provoking post - love the illustrations :-)
jet28 · 2010-01-18: 04:50
|
|
|
I like your mask. =) For me art is something like a specially created meaning that has an impact on me. I consider those things which inspire me or give me catharsis great art.
Nellinka · 2010-01-18: 05:40
|
|
|
life is one of art.
jessicashan · 2010-01-18: 08:11
|
|
I was staring at our art teacher boobs all the time and i was thinking, oh ya this is real art...so i dont remember any thing else.....but you did good job.
????? · 2010-01-18: 09:25
|
|
|
Well done!!!!!!!
urmysunshine · 2010-01-18: 10:09
|
|
|
great post ricky!!
jennye · 2010-01-18: 10:43
|
|
|
Só pelas diferentes opiniões aqui vê-se que não há consenso na definição de arte. Para mim arte é muito subjectiva, aquilo de que gosto, que é belo e original aos meus olhos não o é necessariamente aos olhos dos outros. É um pouco como a religião ou a politica, não se chega a um denominador comum.
Unchained · 2010-01-18: 12:31
|
|
|
Interesting post ! For me it's also the expression against everything I disapprove. How I express fear, rage... It's a kind of resistance. But that's my point of view...
Balladina · 2010-01-18: 15:33
|
|
|
this si so difficult,,,art,,,comes straight from the soul,,,and has to connect with other´´s soul to have sense, but unfortunately not everybody´s soul has art eye ;) Very well done Rick!!!!!
TIM927 · 2010-01-18: 15:45
|
|
|
Este set é arte;)
JaCkYe · 2010-01-18: 16:04
|
|
|
a very thought provokation post. You can see everything as an art if you want to see it that way. But if you are in no mood, all masterpieces are rubbish. ^_^
huiching · 2010-01-18: 17:38
|
|
|
Really creative!
pandka · 2010-01-18: 17:44
|
|
|
oh...this is the best ever post I have read I think!!!!! :) :)
elizzi · 2010-01-18: 18:06
|
|
|
This is an excellent post....from the beginning and upto this point. What is art is such a subjective question, because for me, anything that moves me in such a way that surprises me, makes me gaze or even better, makes me gasp, is art. For me, whether it's in the form of print, reel or drama, if there's passion and emotion in it, it is art. :)
livelovelaugh · 2010-01-18: 23:35
|
|
Excellent post Ricky.
????? · 2010-01-23: 02:33
|
|
|
loool :D and yes this is art :D best are from my bro
onlymehdi · 2010-03-12: 07:45
|
|
«
|
»
|